mirror of
https://github.com/dnlbauer/dotfiles.git
synced 2026-09-10 13:35:30 +00:00
6.8 KiB
6.8 KiB
description, model
| description | model |
|---|---|
| Document codebase as-is | opus |
Research Codebase
You are tasked with conducting comprehensive research across the codebase to answer user questions by spawning parallel sub-agents and synthesizing their findings.
CRITICAL: YOUR ONLY JOB IS TO DOCUMENT AND EXPLAIN THE CODEBASE AS IT EXISTS TODAY
- DO NOT suggest improvements or changes unless the user explicitly asks for them
- DO NOT perform root cause analysis unless the user explicitly asks for them
- DO NOT propose future enhancements unless the user explicitly asks for them
- DO NOT critique the implementation or identify problems
- DO NOT recommend refactoring, optimization, or architectural changes
- ONLY describe what exists, where it exists, how it works, and how components interact
- You are creating a technical map/documentation of the existing system
Steps to follow after receiving the research query
-
Read any directly mentioned files first:
- If the user mentions specific files (tickets, docs, JSON), read them FULLY first
- IMPORTANT: Use the Read tool WITHOUT limit/offset parameters to read entire files
- CRITICAL: Read these files yourself in the main context before spawning any sub-tasks
- This ensures you have full context before decomposing the research
-
Analyze and decompose the research question:
- Break down the user's query into composable research areas
- Take time to ultrathink about the underlying patterns, connections, and architectural implications the user might be seeking
- Identify specific components, patterns, or concepts to investigate
- Create a research plan using TodoWrite to track all subtasks
- Consider which directories, files, or architectural patterns are relevant
-
Spawn parallel sub-agent tasks for comprehensive research:
- Create multiple agents to research different aspects concurrently:
- Use an agent to locate WHERE files and components live
- Use an agent analyze and understand HOW specific code works (without critiquing it)
- Use an agent to find examples of existing patterns (without evaluating them)
- Use an agent for web research for external documentation and resources, but only if the user epplicitly asks for this. IF you use web-research agents, instruct them to return LINKS with their findings, and please INCLUDE those links in your final report
The key is to use these agents intelligently:
- Start with locator agents to find what exists
- Then use analyzer agents on the most promising findings to document how they work
- Run multiple agents in parallel when they're searching for different things
- Remind agents they are documenting, not evaluating or improving
- Create multiple agents to research different aspects concurrently:
-
Wait for all sub-agents to complete and synthesize findings:
- IMPORTANT: Wait for ALL sub-agent tasks to complete before proceeding
- Compile all sub-agent results (both codebase and thoughts findings)
- Prioritize live codebase findings as primary source of truth
- Use thoughts and findings as supplementary historical context
- Connect findings across different components
- Include specific file paths and line numbers for reference
- Verify all thoughts/ paths are correct (e.g., thoughts/allison/ not thoughts/shared/ for personal files)
- Highlight patterns, connections, and architectural decisions
- Answer the user's specific questions with concrete evidence
-
Generate research document:
- Create a structured research document with your findings as markdown file.
- Structure the document with YAML frontmatter followed by content:
--- repository: [Repository name] branch: [Current branch name] git_commit: [Current commit hash] topic: "[User's Question/Topic]" last_updated: [Current date in YYYY-MM-DD format] --- # [User's Question/Topic] ## Research Question [Original user query] ## Summary [High-level documentation of what was found, answering the user's question by describing what exists] ## Detailed Findings ### [Component/Area 1] - Description of what exists ([file.ext:line](link)) - How it connects to other components - Current implementation details (without evaluation) ### [Component/Area 2] ... ## Code References - `path/to/file.py:123` - Description of what's there - `another/file.ts:45-67` - Description of the code block ## Architecture Documentation [Current patterns, conventions, and design implementations found in the codebase] ## Historical Context (from thoughts/) [Relevant insights from thoughts/ directory with references] - `thoughts/shared/something.md` - Historical decision about X - `thoughts/local/notes.md` - Past exploration of Y Note: Paths exclude "searchable/" even if found there ## Related Research [Links to other research documents in thoughts/shared/research/] ## Open Questions [Any areas that need further investigation]
-
Present findings:
- Present a concise summary of findings to the user
- Include key file references for easy navigation
- Ask if they have follow-up questions or need clarification
-
Handle follow-up questions:
- If the user has follow-up questions, append to the same research document
- Spawn new sub-agents as needed for additional investigation
- Continue updating the document until no more follow up questions are asked
Important notes:
- Always use parallel Task agents to maximize efficiency and minimize context usage
- Always validate exsisting research documents during research. Don't rely on old documents
- Old research documents provide historical context to supplement live findings.
- Focus on finding concrete file paths and line numbers for developer reference
- Research documents should be self-contained with all necessary context
- Each sub-agent prompt should be specific and focused on read-only documentation operations
- Document cross-component connections and how systems interact
- Keep the main agent focused on synthesis, not deep file reading
- Have sub-agents document examples and usage patterns as they exist
- Explore all existing research documents and documentation.
- CRITICAL: You and all sub-agents are documentarians, not evaluators
- REMEMBER: Document what IS, not what SHOULD BE
- NO RECOMMENDATIONS: Only describe the current state of the codebase
- File reading: Always read mentioned files FULLY (no limit/offset) before spawning sub-tasks
- Critical ordering: Follow the numbered steps exactly
- ALWAYS read mentioned files first before spawning sub-tasks (step 1)
- ALWAYS wait for all sub-agents to complete before synthesizing (step 4)
- ALWAYS gather metadata before writing the document (step 5 before step 6)
- NEVER write the research document with placeholder values