Mistaken indexes fix

This commit is contained in:
Николай Данаилов
2020-05-19 13:04:33 +03:00
committed by GitHub
parent 482783da26
commit 461a27df81

View File

@@ -683,7 +683,7 @@
"\n",
"$$ \\frac{\\partial J}{\\partial x_k^{(i)}} = \\sum_{j:r(i,j)=1} \\left( \\left(\\theta^{(j)}\\right)^T x^{(i)} - y^{(i,j)} \\right) \\theta_k^{(j)} $$\n",
"\n",
"$$ \\frac{\\partial J}{\\partial \\theta_k^{(j)}} = \\sum_{i:r(i,j)=1} \\left( \\left(\\theta^{(j)}\\right)^T x^{(i)}- y^{(i,j)} \\right) x_k^{(j)} $$\n",
"$$ \\frac{\\partial J}{\\partial \\theta_k^{(j)}} = \\sum_{i:r(i,j)=1} \\left( \\left(\\theta^{(j)}\\right)^T x^{(i)}- y^{(i,j)} \\right) x_k^{(i)} $$\n",
"\n",
"Note that the function returns the gradient for both sets of variables by unrolling them into a single vector. After you have completed the code to compute the gradients, the next cell run a gradient check\n",
"(available in `utils.checkCostFunction`) to numerically check the implementation of your gradients (this is similar to the numerical check that you used in the neural networks exercise. If your implementation is correct, you should find that the analytical and numerical gradients match up closely.\n",
@@ -809,7 +809,7 @@
"\n",
"$$ \\frac{\\partial J}{\\partial x_k^{(i)}} = \\sum_{j:r(i,j)=1} \\left( \\left(\\theta^{(j)}\\right)^T x^{(i)} - y^{(i,j)} \\right) \\theta_k^{(j)} + \\lambda x_k^{(i)} $$\n",
"\n",
"$$ \\frac{\\partial J}{\\partial \\theta_k^{(j)}} = \\sum_{i:r(i,j)=1} \\left( \\left(\\theta^{(j)}\\right)^T x^{(i)}- y^{(i,j)} \\right) x_k^{(j)} + \\lambda \\theta_k^{(j)} $$\n",
"$$ \\frac{\\partial J}{\\partial \\theta_k^{(j)}} = \\sum_{i:r(i,j)=1} \\left( \\left(\\theta^{(j)}\\right)^T x^{(i)}- y^{(i,j)} \\right) x_k^{(i)} + \\lambda \\theta_k^{(j)} $$\n",
"\n",
"This means that you just need to add $\\lambda x^{(i)}$ to the `X_grad[i,:]` variable described earlier, and add $\\lambda \\theta^{(j)}$ to the `Theta_grad[j, :]` variable described earlier.\n",
"\n",